Aryans And Dravidians

 

Most scientific evidence would seem to suggest that both the Aryans and the Dravidians were migrants who arrived in India from Africa . (The "out of Africa theory", that is consistent with genetic evidence too).

The differences in linguistic and physical features that we get to see today, would suggest that the Aryan and Dravidian peoples were geographically isolated from each other for a few thousand years (prior to around 6000 years back when they came in contact again in the Indian sub-continent). Only a large enough period of geographical separation could have resulted in these differences.

It is also true that in the past around 6000 to 8000 years, the Aryan and Dravidian peoples have been in close contact. In this period, a significant amount of linguistic, cultural and genetic inter-mingling would seem to have occurred. The visible differences that persist today are the remnants that have survived this proximity and intermingling in the last few thousand years.

This would explain the fact that typically, Dravidian characterists persist to a greater degree in the far South; and in inaccessible tribal regions of North India .

It is also reasonable to presume that the caste system (significantly referred to as " varna " or "colour") originated in the times when the Aryans and the Dravidians came in contact after the period of a few thousand years of separation. The legend of Onam too talks of the "Asura" king Mahabali being deposed by Vamana, a "Brahmin".

It is also said that there is no significant genetic difference among modern day Indians. Perhaps the Aryans (who probably came on horses, like the Moghuls) were an all male contingent -- who had to take local (Dravidian) women as mates as soon as they settled down. Being patriarchal, the offsprings of males aryans would have been regarded as aryans (despite dravidian mothers).


Or may be, as in case of English language and culture (that have been willingly adopted by Indian elites, and these converted into symbols of superiority) in modern India , the Aryan language and culture too were willingly adopted by the native (Dravidian) elites -- who thus became the Brahmins and other Suvarnas.


Perhaps, a combination of the above two possibilities may have played out.


It would seem reasonable that political preferences should not come in the way our making speculations that are consistent with ALL available evidence...

 
Anand Nair
 
PS dated 13 Jan 2011
 
The thesis (whose link is given below) was put forward in a judgment delivered on January 5, 2011 by a Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra. This is largely in line with my own blog

India, largely a country of immigrants

http://www.hindu.com/2011/01/12/stories/2011011253071300.htm


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Limits of Rationalism?

Compared to the many other parts of India, rationalist movement took roots much earlier in Kerala. This development also intersected with leftist ideologies that emphasized social justice, equality, and scientific temper. This collaboration helped in gaining wider popular support for rationalist principles in the early 20th century. However, the movement has undergone sharp ideological cleavage in last decade (as indeed, many nuclear families have!) The group identified mainly with Dr C Viswanathan views irrational beliefs as something that afflicts all religions, as also some atheistic political ideologies. In contrast, the other group that idolizes Prof C Ravichandran seeks to target Islam in particular -- often supporting aspects of the Muslim-baiting agenda of the RSS -- such the UCC, opposition to Reservations, support for the criminalizing of "Triple Talaq", CAA and so on. A Left Vs Right split! Mulling on the above scenario, I have had some insights that I wish to shar...
Read more
Race, Caste and Breed Most people agree that all humans belong to the same species -- but some insist that we belong to different "races". This is often done in a flippant manner, without defining what is "race" in a biological sense. There are many "average" differences between Tamil Brahmins as group and a Kashmiri Brahmins as a group. Can these average differences be used to categorize them as belonging to different races (in a biological sense)? If not so, then what is the threshold of "biological difference" that would place a person in one "race" rather than in another? Biology has NOT found such a definable threshold.  What about dog "breeds"? Why are these breeds NOT called dog "races"? Different breeds of dogs have huge differences in external appearance, size, intelligence etc (much more so than between African humans and Caucasian humans). Yet, all dog breeds are biologically grouped in the same biological...
Read more
  The Revolution’s Gentle Dawn—And the Lessons We Lost Introduction In the winter of 1917, Russia did the impossible: it toppled a 300-year autocracy without firing a shot . Crowds melted imperial insignia into souvenir medallions; soldiers and students debated socialism in tram cars. John Reed, the American journalist who wandered Petrograd in those days, wrote: "It was less a revolution than a festival of hope." The tragedy is not that violence came later—but that it didn’t have to. The revolution’s bloodless birth proves change can be gentle. Its collapse proves how easily we forget that. 1. The Peaceful Revolution The February Revolution (March 1917 by our calendar) was a marvel of restraint: The Czar’s Quiet Exit : Nicholas II abdicated after his own generals refused to crush protests. The crowds didn’t storm the Winter Palace—they ignored it. A clerk’s diary noted: "The Tsar left like a guest who overstayed." The...
Read more